Rules and regulation

1. This project officially ended on 12 December 2009.

2. If you posted anything or edited anything, please credit yourself as the author.

3. Please just favorite this blog for teammates.

4. Do not link in blog to keep in confidential to other FYP team. (Now you have the right to link it to your blog. :)

5. For outsiders visiting this blog, please do not copy any of our contents or photographs without all our teammates permission. Offenders will be reported.

6. Lastly, please practice PROFESSIONALISM.

7. To copy logbook:
meeting 1 - 13 august

Let's just talk talk~

ShoutMix chat widget

Thursday, October 22, 2009

meeting 27 - 20 october

time: 4.30pm - 6pm
all present

Suggestions of failure:
- wrong experimentation design
- extracting failure
- did not use ginger (pure) immediately
- combination would have cause a better effect

Lime: results shown

Why lime gave the results?
- Properties (Physical/Chemical)

Does lime acidity (pH) has any effect on the zone of inhibition?
If yes, how to prove?

- What causes the inhibition in lime? The active ingredients?

- No consistency in the results. Need to state how much is the different. Double?

* Need to tabulate results!

What cause the different results in the runs?
- storage of extract
- amount
- different people measure (not valid!)
- time of measurement

- Why S.epidymidis? Why use e.coli?

Things need to be done:

- Send Aliza TLC protocol
- Next lab session: Monday, 26th
- Report

1. result of run 3:
Lpg - 1.1cm
nab - 0.9cm

nab - 0.8cm
L - 1.1cm

nab - 2cm
Lpg - 1.5cm

nab - 2.2cm
L - 1.6cm
Leg - 1.1cm

2. summary of all 3 runs:

3. reasons for inconsistency in the result: